- Home
- The Paranormal
- Reading the Tarot in three easy steps!
Reading the Tarot in three easy steps!
- By Nadine Wilson
- Published 11/25/2007
- The Paranormal
-
Rating:




Nadine Wilson
I am: demiurge, incipient storyteller and honourary mamacat. Occasionally acid. Prone to biting. Given to bouts of TMI (you've been warned). Language is important. Words are important. Use them well, please.
View all articles by Nadine Wilson
All right, show of hands: how many of us have, at some point in our lives, coughed up money to a psychic? Bought a horoscope or birth chart? Paid for a reading of cards or other fortune-telling?
My hand's up, too. You don't have to be ashamed. What's more, I've been on the other side of the transaction. Granted, I was seventeen and doing it entirely on a whim to make money for a school fundraiser, but I suppose it counts. I would like to say, for the record, that reading palms in the ingress line for a Halloween haunted house is fun. It's amazing how credulous people get after dark when they're working themselves up into a lather to be frightened. Given I had only a rudimentary grasp on any of the necessary knowledge, I had a fairly high accuracy rate, at least, according to myvictims customers. My impromptu palm-reading booth raked in more money, working for tips, than the official bake sale table.
I was delighted.
The human mind is fascinated with the idea of seeing the future, or knowing the unknowable. Divination and soothsaying have been important aspects of most cultures, whether in the form of gypsy fortune-tellers or Biblical prophets; from the Oracle at Delphi to Victorian palmists to "what's your sign, man?" in the 70's. There's a thriving trade in giving psychic advice to the lost or questioning (Psychic Friends Network, anyone?). Skeptical? Check out the classifieds section of any alternative newspaper. Check out the bulletin boards at the local S-Mart or Mug'o'Java. Check out CraigsList. If the amount of listings is any indication, there's a psychic on every streetcorner. There are chat rooms devoted to giving, and getting, readings (hysterically entertaining, by the way, if you're ever bored and in need of a good laugh). There are palmists and Tarot readers in flea markets and festivals; entire telephone networks are devoted to telling people that their boss is cheating on them with the next big Lotto winner.
I don't have an explanation for this, for all that I'm part of it. The skeptical part of me denies that there is anything more to psychic talents or fortune telling than slightly-educated guesswork and generalities applicable to anyone at all. On the other hand, I've had an experience or two that make the believer in me stick its tongue out at the skeptic and blow a spectacular raspberry. I'll put myself officially on the fence: while I am unwilling to concede the existence of psychic abilities, I'll admit that the use of an intuitive fortune-telling system can be a helpful tool for at least learning one's own mind about an issue.
As I've said, I've told fortunes before. My amateurish bout of palmistry aside, I spent a few years studying Norse runes and their application as a system of divination, and during the peak of my interest, I used them to read for friends, with a fairly high rate of accuracy. Whether this was due to any validity of the system or simply to the gullibility of my friends I won't speculate. Feel free to form your own opinions, of course. I experimented with the Tarot, but never really got along with it, and I've been somewhat casually toying with reading playing cards (yep, it can be done. Who knew?).
I've had my fortune told, as well, and recently. In the interests of curiosity (and the fact that I can do this sort of thing in an official capacity, if I'm writing about it- hooray justification!), I paid for a card reading by a lovely woman named Sarina Stone, at the Renaissance Festival a couple of weeks ago.
I expected the traditional Tarot, but the deck was something I'd never seen before, and as I didn't have pen and paper handy, I didn't write down the name. Of course I've forgotten now. It made use of archetype and symbolism, however, similar to the Tarot and most other forms of cartomancy, although the particular set of archetypes differed. I hesitate to go into particular details publicly, as the matter we discussed was somewhat personal, but there were several points at which the reading intersected accurately with the situation about which I'd asked, enough to make me feel I'd got my money's worth ($25, for the curious).
I've a good friend who reads the Tarot, as well. I can say with complete honesty, at risk of offending my internal skeptic and external skeptics everywhere, that she is scarily accurate. It's a family tradition, she tells me, and is something she learned from a very young age. In talking to her, I've come to the conclusion that whether or not there is any mystical power inherent in the Tarot or other system of divination, the attitudes people bring to it- and that includes the reader as well as the client- grant it a certain level of influence. Much like astrology, the patterns of cards, rune-stones, etc. on a table are often generalized enough for one to interpret them however one chooses. However- and this is the key- that interpretation can indeed be helpful in illuminating a problem, and a potential solution. Just the action of thinking about a situation in the different perspective a reading might force often brings a new awareness of that problem. The selection and placement of, for example, cards from a deck is of course governed by chance (unless your reader is an ex-dealer from Vegas), and a rational mind can't accept that they, as inanimate objects, know and represent what has happened in one's life, or what will happen. They may not... but you know what's gone on in your life, and you bring that awareness to the table whereon the cards lie. You interpret what the cards/dice/stones/sticks/animal viscera mean- or, more usually, your reader does- and you apply that interpretation to your awareness. Perhaps startlingly, this often leads to truthful insight. Does that mean the Tarot is somehow magical, tapping into realms to which the average Joe does not have access? Not necessarily. That doesn't mean it's not an effective and useful tool.
For the curious, I've included a link at the bottom of this column to a website I stumbled across, that offers a free, online, three-card reading. Give it a go! If nothing else, it's an interesting way to waste five minutes, and who knows? You might come away a little wiser.
While my casual forays into the world of fortune-telling haven't given me any impetus to really believe one way or the other, of course ymmv. If you have had any experiences (either toward the genuine or the completely fraudulent) that you'd like to share, please do leave a comment below, or drop me an email. I'd like to hear others' take on this. Make me a skeptic, or make me a believer! And as usual, I'm always on the lookout for the strange, odd, bizarre, bewildering, unexplained and blatantly paranormal. If you've heard about or experienced something that you feel fits those criteria, please feel free to comment or email. I can't promise fame and fortune, but if your story catches my interest (and offers enough material to appropriately pad a column), I can offer ten seconds of dubious glory here at Firefox.org.
My hand's up, too. You don't have to be ashamed. What's more, I've been on the other side of the transaction. Granted, I was seventeen and doing it entirely on a whim to make money for a school fundraiser, but I suppose it counts. I would like to say, for the record, that reading palms in the ingress line for a Halloween haunted house is fun. It's amazing how credulous people get after dark when they're working themselves up into a lather to be frightened. Given I had only a rudimentary grasp on any of the necessary knowledge, I had a fairly high accuracy rate, at least, according to my
I was delighted.
The human mind is fascinated with the idea of seeing the future, or knowing the unknowable. Divination and soothsaying have been important aspects of most cultures, whether in the form of gypsy fortune-tellers or Biblical prophets; from the Oracle at Delphi to Victorian palmists to "what's your sign, man?" in the 70's. There's a thriving trade in giving psychic advice to the lost or questioning (Psychic Friends Network, anyone?). Skeptical? Check out the classifieds section of any alternative newspaper. Check out the bulletin boards at the local S-Mart or Mug'o'Java. Check out CraigsList. If the amount of listings is any indication, there's a psychic on every streetcorner. There are chat rooms devoted to giving, and getting, readings (hysterically entertaining, by the way, if you're ever bored and in need of a good laugh). There are palmists and Tarot readers in flea markets and festivals; entire telephone networks are devoted to telling people that their boss is cheating on them with the next big Lotto winner.
I don't have an explanation for this, for all that I'm part of it. The skeptical part of me denies that there is anything more to psychic talents or fortune telling than slightly-educated guesswork and generalities applicable to anyone at all. On the other hand, I've had an experience or two that make the believer in me stick its tongue out at the skeptic and blow a spectacular raspberry. I'll put myself officially on the fence: while I am unwilling to concede the existence of psychic abilities, I'll admit that the use of an intuitive fortune-telling system can be a helpful tool for at least learning one's own mind about an issue.
As I've said, I've told fortunes before. My amateurish bout of palmistry aside, I spent a few years studying Norse runes and their application as a system of divination, and during the peak of my interest, I used them to read for friends, with a fairly high rate of accuracy. Whether this was due to any validity of the system or simply to the gullibility of my friends I won't speculate. Feel free to form your own opinions, of course. I experimented with the Tarot, but never really got along with it, and I've been somewhat casually toying with reading playing cards (yep, it can be done. Who knew?).
I've had my fortune told, as well, and recently. In the interests of curiosity (and the fact that I can do this sort of thing in an official capacity, if I'm writing about it- hooray justification!), I paid for a card reading by a lovely woman named Sarina Stone, at the Renaissance Festival a couple of weeks ago.
I've a good friend who reads the Tarot, as well. I can say with complete honesty, at risk of offending my internal skeptic and external skeptics everywhere, that she is scarily accurate. It's a family tradition, she tells me, and is something she learned from a very young age. In talking to her, I've come to the conclusion that whether or not there is any mystical power inherent in the Tarot or other system of divination, the attitudes people bring to it- and that includes the reader as well as the client- grant it a certain level of influence. Much like astrology, the patterns of cards, rune-stones, etc. on a table are often generalized enough for one to interpret them however one chooses. However- and this is the key- that interpretation can indeed be helpful in illuminating a problem, and a potential solution. Just the action of thinking about a situation in the different perspective a reading might force often brings a new awareness of that problem. The selection and placement of, for example, cards from a deck is of course governed by chance (unless your reader is an ex-dealer from Vegas), and a rational mind can't accept that they, as inanimate objects, know and represent what has happened in one's life, or what will happen. They may not... but you know what's gone on in your life, and you bring that awareness to the table whereon the cards lie. You interpret what the cards/dice/stones/sticks/animal viscera mean- or, more usually, your reader does- and you apply that interpretation to your awareness. Perhaps startlingly, this often leads to truthful insight. Does that mean the Tarot is somehow magical, tapping into realms to which the average Joe does not have access? Not necessarily. That doesn't mean it's not an effective and useful tool.
For the curious, I've included a link at the bottom of this column to a website I stumbled across, that offers a free, online, three-card reading. Give it a go! If nothing else, it's an interesting way to waste five minutes, and who knows? You might come away a little wiser.
While my casual forays into the world of fortune-telling haven't given me any impetus to really believe one way or the other, of course ymmv. If you have had any experiences (either toward the genuine or the completely fraudulent) that you'd like to share, please do leave a comment below, or drop me an email. I'd like to hear others' take on this. Make me a skeptic, or make me a believer! And as usual, I'm always on the lookout for the strange, odd, bizarre, bewildering, unexplained and blatantly paranormal. If you've heard about or experienced something that you feel fits those criteria, please feel free to comment or email. I can't promise fame and fortune, but if your story catches my interest (and offers enough material to appropriately pad a column), I can offer ten seconds of dubious glory here at Firefox.org.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Related Links
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Joe)
Rating:








Tarot reading is yesterday's news. Tarot's mystery is now dead. We know the cards were created 15th century Italy and we know they were created for playing a trick taking card game and not for fortune telling.
Why not tell us about actual card games played with the tarot? Playing a tarot card game is very popular right now in places such as France.
I rate this article as mediocre because it's the same fortune telling angle that's become tired now and it says nothing about real card games played with tarot decks.
Comment #2 (Posted by Nadine)
Rating:








Of course Tarot is old news, precisely because it's been around since 15th century Italy. I wasn't trying for an in-depth expose on the Tarot deck, I was touching briefly on a phenomenon that, old news or not, seems to still have quite a strong hold over the human mind (and not just the Tarot, but seemingly endless other forms of divination/fortune-telling as well). An article under the Paranormal heading probably wouldn't do very well to focus on the card-game aspect of this sort of thing, now would it? :)
I'll try to be clearer re: the actual forcus of my writing in future.
Comment #3 (Posted by Joe)
Rating:








Tarot reading is not authentic
because those cards were not really intended for fortune telling. Cartomancy is not what tarot is really supposed to be. Tarot cards are no more paranormal then regular playing cards. Tarot is meant to be played as a card game as they do in France or Italy.
The American people should be more aware of tarot instead of always thinking it's about fortune telling. I've taught some friends how to play tarot and a number of them quit the fortune telling and are playing an actual game with the cards now. The only reason they did tarot fortune telling in the first place was because they liked the look of the cards but did not know of any other use for them. The mainstream media here in America continue to keep the general public ignorant about tarot cards.
Comment #4 (Posted by Peggie)
Rating:








This article took a nice slant on an old topic -- "to be-lieve or not to be-lieve." I like your tone and your pace. I enjoyed the insight about the readee and the reader bringing their own "stuff" to the table and the point that (like in most of life) we get out much of what we expected at the outset. I'm a palmist -- and I don't do divinatory or psychic readings -- my goal in every reading is to simply elicit the current "stuck spot" for my client and help them find some doorways out of what may be holding them back. Your article is a welcome look at the whole industry of "psychic" and the individual's return on their investment!
Comment #5 (Posted by Nadine)
Rating:








@Joe: Which is all well and good, and that would, I'm sure, make for a fascinating historical piece in another setting, but I wasn't writing about card games, nor was I specifically targeting the Tarot:. I was briefly looking at fortune-telling in general, and it happened to be the example I used most, because it's a system most people have heard of. I could just as easily have used astrology, I suppose, or runes, or extspicy (except then I'd have to deal with PETA and that's never fun).
Nor, I think, does the Tarot's potential history as a playing card deck negate its usefulness as a tool for divination, given my speculation toward the end of the article. As I said: I am not convinced *any* fortune-telling systems are 'magical' or 'psychic' (nor, necessarily, are their users). This doesn't mean that they cannot be useful in the context in which they're normally found. The Tarot was a card game? Great. Norse runes were an alphabet. Neither of those details changes the fact that they're both now *also* popular divination tools, which was the angle I wished to look at, not their history. I don't have enough column space for that. *g*
Comment #6 (Posted by Joe)
Rating:








It is incorrect to state that tarot WAS a card game. It still IS a card game. People mainly in Europe are still using tarot cards for actual games. There is also a growing number of people outside Europe interested in these games.
There is a common but false notion that tarot cards are only used for the occult. Since this article does nothing to dispel this notion, I had to rate it mediocre.
Comment #7 (Posted by Han)
Rating:








I don't think that's what the article is about, Joe. Sure, the writer could have pointed it out, but since it really has little to do with her topic - which is the way we interact with supposedly ocult practices (but in reality what Pratchett's Granny Weatherwax would call 'headology') and not the history of playing cards - it would diminish the focus of the article. *That* would make it mediocre, not the fact that she's sticking to her topic.
Comment #8 (Posted by Han)
Rating:








But the nature of Tarocchi has little to do with what this article is about. Sure, the author could have pointed it out, but doing so would have diluted the focus of the text, which is about our interaction with supposedly occult but in reality more psychological practices, and not about the history of playing cards. Had she done that, it would have made the text mediocre; identifying the subject and sticking to it makes it good.
Comment #9 (Posted by Joe (sort of))
Rating:








I completely fail to understand the topic of this column and mindlessly perpetuate my own slavering agenda which is somehow obsessed with the playing-card uses of tarot. When you write a column about reading tea leaves I will loudly remind you that tea can also be drunk and it is you foolish Americans who have forgotten this and why haven't you written about drinking tea. I am an idiot.
Comment #10 (Posted by Raijin)
Rating:








"Tarot reading is not authentic." Sounds like someone has no idea how divination works. You can use literally anything for that purpose (bibliomancy, anyone?). Whatever tarot cards were designed for originally, you can use them for divination as well. Things can have (gasp!) more than one use, you know.
"Tarot reading is yesterday's news. Tarot's mystery is now dead." Unless you add the words, "to me" to both of those sentences, that's just plain stupid and not worth addressing-- only mocking.
Berating the stubbornly and willfully ignorant aside, I have to say this was an excellent article. I myself have had many spookily accurate readings from tarot cards, including the virtual ones on facade.com (which give free readings featuring a number of decks and spreads, as well as runes, biorhythms, etc.). I've even had someone give me a reading using a deck of playing cards, and it was DAMN spookily accurate. The only reason I haven't gotten into giving myself readings is because I'm more of an I-Ching kind of fella (though I suppose the mystery of that is also "dead," eh?).
Comment #11 (Posted by Manu)
Rating:








@Nadine: Not much for the psychic here, but I thought you did a good job of straddling the line between believing and not believing. I especially like the transition into the statement that while your future may not be told, it can still help you decide what's wrong with the 'now', and that can help a person decide their own fate.
@Joe: It's a supernatural column. Had she gone into a tangent about how Tarot is originally a game, she wouldn't be doing her job, which is to write a colums about <i>supernatural phenomenon</i>. Rating it as mediocre because she didn't touch an aspect you find more important mean you missed the point of not just the article, but the column.
Comment #12 (Posted by 14736251)
Rating:








This article doesn't actually explain anything about the Tarot, nor does it give any historical information about it. Just wishful thinking and personal opinion. This is the writer's column, for that I am certain, but the least it could have provided was some history or overview. You don't hear about this until poor Joe's comment. He was right, in minor a sense. Something here was lacking.
In any case, the Tarot can be read by anybody, and this article fails to outline how important it is to view the cards as mere entertainment, not a source of enlightenment. Anybody who takes the advice of the cards is a fool. They reflect mood, like mood rings, and change the minute a person's viewpoint about the world changes. The analysis given about them is subjective to the opinions of the practitioner and receiver, and therefore provides a limited scope of understanding.
Comment #13 (Posted by Joe)
Rating:








It doesn't matter how divination works as tarot cards were not intended for that purpose. Virtually every American writing about the subject of tarot cards writes it from an occulto-centric bias. This article is no different so therefore I call it mediocre. It is mediocre because it does nothing to challenge the common stereotypes and myths about this deck. The article is contrived to revive the corpse of tarot's mystery. The mystery of tarot is dead and the funeral is overdue. This article is engaged in make believe, it pretends that those cards are still "mysterious" It says nothing about how fortune tellers use "fishing" and "cold reading" tecniques. This article has very little substance. Most Americans don't really get tarot because authentic tarot was never imported to our shores at least in a big way. Tarot in the USA is nothing more than Rider Waite culture because that's the Bible it is based on. One person's interepretation of the iconography of this game has been allowed to have such an undue influence in our country. Meanwhile the substance of tarot, which are rules for this card game, remain for the most part in Europe. Someday, perhaps later in the century, more Americans will become enlightened and allow the more authentic tarot to immigrate to our country.
Comment #14 (Posted by 14736251)
Rating:








Joe, you sound like a broken record. Same sad sob story, different post. I think our mommies and daddies taught us a long time ago to say what we need to say once, and then move on. You've said it, they get it. The only step left for you seems to be moving into the writer's house, and I'm not going to finish that sentence because it's inappropriate. Anyway, information processed, it's been digested. Fear not, your argument has not been ignored. Now can this discussion progress without you copying and pasting the same ten sentences for the tenth time?
Comment #15 (Posted by Stephanie)
Rating:








This is an enjoyable article, carping comments aside, and has an excellent unity of purpose. In addition, it made me smile. Hard to beat that combo.
Comment #16 (Posted by an unknown user)
Rating:








Joe: GIVE IT A REST ALREADY.
Comment #17 (Posted by Robin)
Rating:








"The skeptical part of me denies that there is anything more to psychic talents or fortune telling than slightly-educated guesswork and generalities applicable to anyone at all. " Well, here's the part about fishing/cold reading.
Joe is wrong about that part. He is right in pointing out that Tarot is supposed to be for card games. This is something all Tarot related stories should mention. If a Tarot story in the media will not point it out it is the job of Tarot gamers to point it out for you. We should stop the stereotypes about Tarot cards. I also do not like this article because it's an endorsement of charlatanism.
Comment #18 (Posted by Nadine)
Rating:








I'm not entirely sure how to make my point any clearer: the column is not about the Tarot, specifically, and centring it on the cards' history as a game would have been a pointless detraction from the actual focus of it, which was fortune telling *in general*, and its potential application as a method of problem-solving. Endorsement of charlatanism? Not hardly. As I said, I don't believe in telling the *future*; I don't think it's actually possible. But a tool for sorting out your own mind about something? I've heard of worse methods of sifting through one's thoughts on a matter. <i>"If a Tarot story in the media will not point it out it is the job of Tarot gamers to point it out for you."</i> I am hardly the mainstream media, nor am I a Tarot gamer. Given those givens, it's neither my duty nor my interest to grind a highly selective personal axe for a limited group of people. Interested as I may indeed be in Tarocchi, despite the irrelevant blithering over this column, it's not appropriate to the topic I was actually touching on.
Comment #19 (Posted by Perseus Evans)
Rating:








For those going on about the lack of mention of Tarot in its original form as the tarocchi deck or the game for which it was originally intended : Tarocchi - fifteenth century trumps-based card game derided by the poet Berni as "stupid, foolish, simple, fit only to be used by bakers, cobblers, and the vulgar". Promoted as a tool for divination by Antoine Court (de Gébelin) a couple of hundred years later in 'Le Monde primitif'. There. It's been said. Now shut up whinging about the article, which was about the popularity of the divination phenomenon and the author's personal experiences. If you want an article on the history of the game, go and look at an encyclopedia. This is not the article you are looking for. ~mysterious pass of the hands~
Comment #20 (Posted by Melissa)
Rating:








Great article, Nadine! Pity some people can't take it for what it is and not an article about their own personal subculture of same. (I've got half a dozen people who use Tarot for divination just on my speed-dial. They're friends; I don't call them for readings. Just so we're clear.) The difference between a stereotype and a fact is that one is made-up on limited data, and the other is based on reality. Tarot is used as a popular divination tool, often for personal use (which eliminates the so-called "charlatan" aspect). Some people also use it as a card game, but since this article wasn't in our "Games and Gaming" section, I don't see why in the world it matters. As a side note and a friendly reminder, comments are moderated on this site, and while we encourage healthy discussion, anyone who violates the boundaries of common courtesy will be disemvowelled and may receive the blessings of the holy banhammer. Play nice.
Comment #21 (Posted by Joe)
Rating:








Ys, 'm bck. Ths s nt bd rtcl, ppl. t s wll wrttn nd ntrtnng t crtn pnt. t ds nt brk ny nw grnd n r ndrstndng f trt nd tht s th wknss n th rtcl. Ths s th sm ld prnrml frtn tllng rtcl tht my grndprnts grw p wth.
dsgr wth th pstrs sng th wrd "trcch" t dscrb th crd gm. Th gm n Frnc s clld "trt" n tly t s clld "trcch" Trt s rlly th sm s trcch. Trt rdng s srt f strtyp s t s bsd n lmtd dt. n wy trt rdng s "pltclly ncrrct" bcs th trt rdr s strtypng prt f cltr. cclt trt s bsd n fls thrs rgrdng th rgns f ths crds.
Comment #22 (Posted by Nadine)
Rating:








@Melissa: Heh. Yes'm. ~scuffs toes~
Comment #23 (Posted by Leva Cygnet)
Rating:








Repeating oneself over and over is the cyber-equivalent of shouting someone down in an argument, because you don't want to acknowledge their side. It's very rude. I've had enough.
The penalty for not being nice on this site is losing one's vowels.
Comment #24 (Posted by Robin)
Rating:








@Perseus Evans The original name for those cards was not "Tarocchi" but "Trionfi" The word "Tarot" or a now archaic spelling of it may have preceded the Italian "Tarocchi" The modern card game played in France is called "Tarot" The Austrian versions of it are called "Tarock" and the Hungarian versions "Tarokk"
At the time of the Tarot's creation, card games were not held in as high esteem as a game like chess.
Chess was considered superior to card games and backgammon because there is no randomness or hidden information. I would not be surprised if Tarot was seen as a "vulgar" game many years ago. The cultural appropriation of Tarot by occultists have hardly elevated its status. If anything the occult intervention has further vulgarized it.
Not to put down chess, but the lack of randomness and hidden information in that game may be a weakness. Think of the many drawn games and the memorization of opening moves. While I still play chess once in a while, I think Tarot is a good multi-player alternative to chess.
